Carrying a weapon isn’t always illegal—but the moment it’s linked to a dangerous purpose, it becomes a criminal offence with serious consequences.
Charges under s. 88 are less about what you were carrying—and more about why. Whether it’s a bat in a backpack, a knife in your car, or even a tool used in the wrong setting, prosecutors must prove the item was meant to threaten or harm. These cases often rely on assumptions, fear-based witness statements, or circumstantial evidence. We focus on challenging intent, context, and the reliability of the allegations. With the right legal approach, what started as a weapons charge can often be reduced, diverted, or withdrawn entirely.
Popular questions
What counts as a “weapon for a dangerous purpose”?
It’s any object carried or used with the intent to harm, intimidate, or threaten someone—whether or not it’s typically classified as a weapon.
Can I be charged even if I never used the weapon?
Yes. You can still face charges based on alleged intent, even if the item wasn’t used or displayed. The Crown must prove you meant to use it for a dangerous purpose.
What items can lead to this type of charge?
Common examples include knives, bats, hammers, or even everyday tools—if police or witnesses claim they were carried in a threatening context.
Are there defences to this charge?
Absolutely. Common defences include lack of intent, lawful purpose (e.g. work use), mistaken identity, or Charter violations during the arrest or search.
Schedule your free consultation today!
Our team will answer your questions and talk you through potential next steps.
